![]() New evidence in Trump case bolsters two sets of charges House GOP to turn up heat on feds over gas stovesĬomey: Trump ‘could be wearing an ankle bracelet’ while accepting GOP. Ĭostco shoppers shifting away from specific item CFO says it’s indicator of. Raskin: Recording shows ‘clear understanding’ Trump did not ‘magically’. Maxwell Frost slams DeSantis on stage at DC Paramore concert Manchin says Democrats miscalculated on waiting to negotiate debt deal In Florida, doctors can cite Succubus but educators can’t teach Morrison Trump’s GOP skeptics worry as primary field grows Ĭapitol Police stopped a children’s choir from singing the national. McCarthy’s biggest victory yet comes with political priceįormer Trump attorney says he wouldn’t be surprised if no charges are filed. “It is egregious that one of the wealthiest companies in the world would rather silence journalists than face regulation,” Wicks said. The social media giant has also reportedly moved to block news content in Australia and Canada over similar proposals. ![]() Meta made a similar threat last year after lawmakers introduced to Congress the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act, which would also have required tech companies to pay news outlets for their material. It could mean higher gas prices for US drivers “It is disappointing that California lawmakers appear to be prioritizing the best interests of national and international media companies over their own constituents,” the Meta statement concludes.Ĭalifornia state Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks (D), who sponsored the bill, said Meta’s threat is “a scare tactic that they’ve tried to deploy, unsuccessfully, in every country that’s attempted this.”Įrror in signaling system led to train crash that killed 275 people in India, official says The bill would require covered platforms to pay a “journalism usage fee” for content from local outlets - and require publishers to devote 70 percent of the proceeds from these fees to creating and maintaining journalism jobs in California. Meta’s statement says the California bill, which is now before the state Assembly, “fails to recognize that publishers and broadcasters put their content on our platform themselves and that substantial consolidation in California’s local news industry came over 15 years ago, well before Facebook was widely used.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |